ISO/IEC 27011:2024vs21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls map to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27011:2024 maps to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) with 19% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 27 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls identifies 22 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 27 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 8 of 8 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Clause 1-4: Introduction and Framework(6 mappings)
Clause 7: Physical Controls for Telecommunications(2 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27011:2024 comparisons
Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?
ISO/IEC 27011:2024 has 27 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications, where 6 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?
Of 27 total ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls, 5 map directly to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 22 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27011:2024 to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?
22 ISO/IEC 27011:2024 controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27011:2024 and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 8: Technological Controls for Telecommunications (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.