Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration LaboratoriesvsDO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems

See exactly how ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls map to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
44
Gaps Found
14%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories maps to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems with 14% coverage across 9 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 65 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls identifies 56 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 65 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(12 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions3 targets
Table A-3, Obj. 4HLR Traceability
Table A-5, Obj. 3Source Code Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 2Baselines and Traceability
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability3 targets
Table A-3, Obj. 4HLR Traceability
Table A-5, Obj. 3Source Code Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 2Baselines and Traceability
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements3 targets
Table A-1, Obj. 1Software Development Plan
Table A-1, Obj. 2Software Verification Plan
Table A-2, Obj. 2Derived Requirements
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability3 targets
Table A-3, Obj. 4HLR Traceability
Table A-5, Obj. 3Source Code Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 2Baselines and Traceability

Clause 8: Management System Requirements(3 mappings)

ISO-15189-8.1General requirements
Table A-8, Obj. 3Problem Reporting
ISO-17025-8.1Options
Table A-8, Obj. 3Problem Reporting
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
Table A-8, Obj. 3Problem Reporting

Clause 5: Structural Requirements(5 mappings)

ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity3 targets
Table A-1, Obj. 1Software Development Plan
Table A-1, Obj. 2Software Verification Plan
Table A-2, Obj. 2Derived Requirements
ISO-17025-5.4Personnel for the management system2 targets
Table A-1, Obj. 1Software Development Plan
Table A-1, Obj. 2Software Verification Plan

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Other DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories has 65 controls across its framework, while DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 9 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 19 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

Of 65 total ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls, 9 map directly to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 56 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

56 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct equivalent in DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.