Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration LaboratoriesvsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence

See exactly how ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

26
Controls Mapped
39
Gaps Found
15%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 15% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 65 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls identifies 55 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 65 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 26 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(20 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions6 targets
4.1External Standards
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
5.3Management of Allergens
7.1Training and Competence
8.5Production and Service Provision
8.5.2Identification and Traceability
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability6 targets
4.1External Standards
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
5.3Management of Allergens
7.1Training and Competence
8.5Production and Service Provision
8.5.2Identification and Traceability
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements
9.2Network Domain Security
ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services2 targets
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability5 targets
4.1External Standards
4.2Building Fabric and Facilities
5.3Management of Allergens
7.1Training and Competence
8.5Production and Service Provision

+6 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories has 65 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (15% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 19 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

Of 65 total ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls, 10 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 15% coverage. The remaining 55 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

55 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.