Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security RequirementsvsDO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems

See exactly how NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls map to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
14
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements maps to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems with 23% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 35 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls identifies 27 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in System Protection and Communications.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 35 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Access Control and Identification(4 mappings)

3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual4 targets
Table A-3, Obj. 4HLR Traceability
Table A-5, Obj. 3Source Code Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 2Baselines and Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 3Problem Reporting

Awareness, Training, and Personnel(3 mappings)

3.2Document Control3 targets
Table A-3, Obj. 4HLR Traceability
Table A-5, Obj. 3Source Code Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 2Baselines and Traceability

Audit, Assessment, and Monitoring(6 mappings)

3.3Record Completion and Maintenance3 targets
Table A-1, Obj. 1Software Development Plan
Table A-1, Obj. 2Software Verification Plan
Table A-2, Obj. 2Derived Requirements
3.4Internal Audits3 targets
Table A-3, Obj. 4HLR Traceability
Table A-5, Obj. 3Source Code Traceability
Table A-8, Obj. 2Baselines and Traceability

System Protection and Communications(7 mappings)

FEDRAMP-CM-1Configuration Management Policy
Table A-1, Obj. 3Software Configuration Management Plan
FEDRAMP-CM-2Baseline Configuration
Table A-1, Obj. 3Software Configuration Management Plan
FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings3 targets
Table A-1, Obj. 1Software Development Plan
Table A-1, Obj. 2Software Verification Plan
Table A-2, Obj. 2Derived Requirements
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup2 targets
Table A-1, Obj. 1Software Development Plan
Table A-1, Obj. 2Software Verification Plan

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

Other DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements has 35 controls across its framework, while DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in System Protection and Communications, where 11 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

Of 35 total NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls, 8 map directly to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 27 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

27 NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls have no direct equivalent in DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in System Protection and Communications with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?

The domain with the highest gap count is System Protection and Communications (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.