TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration LaboratoriesvsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

25
Controls Mapped
65
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 12% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 90 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls identifies 79 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 90 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 25 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(16 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.2Personnel
→3.7.1Key generation procedures
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
→3.4Enforce Data Retention
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
→3.4Enforce Data Retention
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements3 targets
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists
→FEDRAMP-CM-6Configuration Settings
→FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
ISO-15189-6.8Externally provided products and services3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Securely Dispose of Data
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability3 targets
→3.1Physical Security
→3.2Establish and Maintain a Data Inventory
→3.4Enforce Data Retention

Clause 8: Management System Requirements(3 mappings)

ISO-15189-8.1General requirements
→3.1Physical Security
ISO-17025-8.1Options
→3.1Physical Security
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
→3.1Physical Security

Clause 5: Structural Requirements(1 mappings)

ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity
→3.3Configure Data Access Control Lists

+5 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 718 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration45 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence15 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs PIC/S Guide to Good Manufacturing Practice for Medicinal Products12 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 1901110 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO 31000:201810 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety Issue 910 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System10 mappingsISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories vs ISO/IEC 27003:201710 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements18 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements17 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements16 mappingsNIST SP 800-146 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-145 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsNIST SP 800-144 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappingsISMAP (Japan) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements15 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories has 90 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 19 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 90 total ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls, 11 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 79 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

79 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 - General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.