ISO/IEC 27003:2017vsDO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems
See exactly how ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls map to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 maps to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems with 14% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 57 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 57 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 16 of 16 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
Leadership (Clause 5)(3 mappings)
Operation (Clause 8)(7 mappings)
Improvement (Clause 10)(3 mappings)
Context of the Organization (Clause 4)(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO/IEC 27003:2017 comparisons
Other DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?
ISO/IEC 27003:2017 has 57 controls across its framework, while DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems covers 36 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 11 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?
Of 57 total ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls, 8 map directly to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 27003:2017 to DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?
49 ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls have no direct equivalent in DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 27003:2017 and DO-178C / ED-12C — Software Considerations in Airborne Systems?
The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.