Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration LaboratoriesvsISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence

See exactly how ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls map to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

24
Controls Mapped
41
Gaps Found
17%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories maps to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence with 17% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 65 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls identifies 54 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 65 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 24 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Clause 6: Resource Requirements(8 mappings)

ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions2 targets
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability2 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability
ISO-15189-6.7Service agreements2 targets
ISO-15189-5.1Legal entity
ISO-15189-5.4Structure and authority
ISO-17025-6.5Metrological traceability2 targets
ISO-15189-6.3Facilities and environmental conditions
ISO-15189-6.5Equipment calibration and metrological traceability

Clause 7: Process Requirements(2 mappings)

ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes2 targets
ISO-15189-5.6Risk management
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records

Clause 8: Management System Requirements(8 mappings)

ISO-15189-8.1General requirements2 targets
ISO-17025-8.1Options
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
ISO-15189-8.4Control of records2 targets
ISO-15189-5.6Risk management
ISO-15189-7.4Post-examination processes
ISO-17025-8.1Options2 targets
ISO-15189-8.1General requirements
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions
ISO-17025-8.7Corrective actions2 targets
ISO-15189-8.1General requirements
ISO-17025-8.1Options

Clause 5: Structural Requirements(2 mappings)

ISO-17025-5.1Legal entity2 targets
ISO-15189-5.1Legal entity
ISO-15189-5.4Structure and authority

+4 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories comparisons

Other ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories has 65 controls across its framework, while ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence covers 64 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (17% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 18 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

Of 65 total ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls, 11 map directly to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls — representing 17% coverage. The remaining 54 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories to ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

54 ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO/IEC 17025:2017 — General Requirements for Testing and Calibration Laboratories and ISO 15189:2022 — Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence?

The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.