TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 37001:2016vsISO 19011:2018

See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to ISO 19011:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
9
Gaps Found
39%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 37001:2016 maps to ISO 19011:2018 with 39% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 25 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 37001:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Context of the organization – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-19011-2018::7.6Maintaining and improving auditor competence
iso-37001-2016::4.3Determining the scope of the anti-bribery management system
→iso-19011-2018::5.5.2Defining the objectives, scope and criteria for an individual audit

Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.2Assigning roles and responsibilities of guides and observers
iso-37001-2016::5.3.1Roles and responsibilities2 targets
→iso-19011-2018::5.4.1Roles and responsibilities of the individual(s) managing the audit programme
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.2Assigning roles and responsibilities of guides and observers

Clause 6 – ISO 37001:2016(1 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-19011-2018::5.3Determining and evaluating audit programme risks and opportunities

Support – ISO 37001:2016(14 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::7.2Competence
→iso-19011-2018::5.4.2Competence of individual(s) managing audit programme
iso-37001-2016::7.2.1General3 targets
→iso-19011-2018::6.2.1General
→iso-19011-2018::7.2.1General
→iso-19011-2018::7.2.2Personal behaviour
iso-37001-2016::7.2.2Employment process
→iso-19011-2018::5.5Implementing audit programme
iso-37001-2016::7.4Communication
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.4Communicating during audit
iso-37001-2016::7.5.1General
→iso-19011-2018::5.5.1General
iso-37001-2016::7.5.2Creating and updating3 targets
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.8Generating audit findings
→iso-19011-2018::6.5Preparing and distributing audit report
→iso-19011-2018::6.5.1Preparing audit report
iso-37001-2016::7.5.3Control of documented information4 targets
→iso-19011-2018::6.3.1Performing review of documented information
→iso-19011-2018::6.3.4Preparing documented information for audit
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.6Reviewing documented information while conducting audit
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.7Collecting and verifying information

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons

ISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 37301:202134 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 9001:201532 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202329 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 27701:201928 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22301:201927 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 45001:201823 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 14001:201523 mappings

Other ISO 19011:2018 comparisons

ISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 19011:201846 mappingsISO 14004:2016 vs ISO 19011:201843 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs ISO 19011:201842 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 19011:201839 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 19011:201833 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 19011:201833 mappingsISO 13485:2016 vs ISO 19011:201833 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 19011:201831 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 19011:2018?

ISO 37001:2016 has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011:2018 covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (39% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 37001:2016, where 7 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct ISO 19011:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 19011:2018?

Of 41 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 16 map directly to ISO 19011:2018 controls — representing 39% coverage. The remaining 25 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to ISO 19011:2018?

25 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 37001:2016 with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 19011:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 37001:2016 (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.