TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 37001:2016vsISO 55001:2014

See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to ISO 55001:2014. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
20
Gaps Found
49%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 37001:2016 maps to ISO 55001:2014 with 49% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 21 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 37001:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-55001-2014::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-37001-2016::10.2Continual improvement2 targets
→iso-55001-2014::10.2Preventive action
→iso-55001-2014::10.3Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 37001:2016(4 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-55001-2014::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-37001-2016::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders
→iso-55001-2014::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders
iso-37001-2016::4.3Determining the scope of the anti-bribery management system
→iso-55001-2014::4.3Determining the scope of the asset management system
iso-37001-2016::4.4Anti-bribery management system
→iso-55001-2014::4.4Asset management system

Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-55001-2014::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-37001-2016::5.2Anti-bribery policy
→iso-55001-2014::5.2Policy
iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-55001-2014::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

Clause 6 – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-55001-2014::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities for the asset management system
iso-37001-2016::6.2Anti-bribery objectives andISO planning
→iso-55001-2014::6.2Asset management objectives and planning to achieve them

Support – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::7.2Competence
→iso-55001-2014::7.2Competence
iso-37001-2016::7.4Communication
→iso-55001-2014::7.4Communication
iso-37001-2016::7.5Documented information
→iso-55001-2014::7.6Documented information

Operation – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::8.1Operational planning and control
→iso-55001-2014::8.1Operational planning and control
iso-37001-2016::8.2Due diligence
→iso-55001-2014::8.2Management of change
iso-37001-2016::8.3Financial controls
→iso-55001-2014::8.3Outsourcing

Performance evaluation – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
→iso-55001-2014::9.1Monitoring, measurement, analysis and evaluation
iso-37001-2016::9.2Internal audit
→iso-55001-2014::9.2Internal audit

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons

ISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 37301:202134 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 9001:201532 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202329 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 27701:201928 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22301:201927 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 45001:201823 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 14001:201523 mappings

Other ISO 55001:2014 comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 55001:201421 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 55001:201421 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 55001:201421 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 55001:201421 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 55001:201421 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 55001:201420 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 55001:201420 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 55001:201419 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 55001:2014?

ISO 37001:2016 has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO 55001:2014 covers 21 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (49% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 37001:2016, where 7 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct ISO 55001:2014 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 55001:2014?

Of 41 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 20 map directly to ISO 55001:2014 controls — representing 49% coverage. The remaining 21 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to ISO 55001:2014?

21 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 55001:2014. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 37001:2016 with 7 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 55001:2014?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 37001:2016 (7 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.