TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 37001:2016vsISO 22000:2018

See exactly how ISO 37001:2016 controls map to ISO 22000:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
7
Gaps Found
78%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 37001:2016 maps to ISO 22000:2018 with 78% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 41 ISO 37001:2016 controls identifies 9 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leadership – ISO 37001:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 41 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 7 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Improvement – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
→iso-22000-2018::10.1Nonconformity and corrective action
iso-37001-2016::10.2Continual improvement
→iso-22000-2018::10.2Continual improvement

Context of the organization – ISO 37001:2016(4 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
→iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-37001-2016::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of stakeholders
→iso-22000-2018::4.2Understanding the needs and expectations of interested parties
iso-37001-2016::4.3Determining the scope of the anti-bribery management system
→iso-22000-2018::4.3Determining the scope of the food safety management system
iso-37001-2016::4.4Anti-bribery management system
→iso-22000-2018::4.4Food safety management system

Leadership – ISO 37001:2016(3 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::5.1Leadership and commitment
→iso-22000-2018::5.1Leadership and commitment
iso-37001-2016::5.2Anti-bribery policy
→iso-22000-2018::5.2Policy
iso-37001-2016::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
→iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities

Clause 6 – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
→iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-37001-2016::6.2Anti-bribery objectives andISO planning
→iso-22000-2018::6.2Objectives of the food safety management system and planning to achieve them

Support – ISO 37001:2016(7 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::7.2Competence
→iso-22000-2018::7.2Competence
iso-37001-2016::7.3Awareness and training
→iso-22000-2018::7.3Awareness
iso-37001-2016::7.4Communication
→iso-22000-2018::7.4Communication
iso-37001-2016::7.5Documented information
→iso-22000-2018::7.5Documented information
iso-37001-2016::7.5.1General
→iso-22000-2018::7.5.1General
iso-37001-2016::7.5.2Creating and updating
→iso-22000-2018::7.5.2Creating and updating
iso-37001-2016::7.5.3Control of documented information
→iso-22000-2018::7.5.3Control of documented information

Operation – ISO 37001:2016(2 mappings)

iso-37001-2016::8.1Operational planning and control
→iso-22000-2018::8.1Operational planning and control
iso-37001-2016::8.2Due diligence
→iso-22000-2018::8.2Prerequisite programmes (PRPs)

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 37001:2016 comparisons

ISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 37301:202134 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 9001:201532 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO/IEC 42001:202329 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 27701:201928 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 22301:201927 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 45001:201823 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 14001:201523 mappingsISO 37001:2016 vs ISO 55001:201420 mappings

Other ISO 22000:2018 comparisons

ISO 9001:2015 vs ISO 22000:201855 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 22000:201842 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 22000:201837 mappingsISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 22000:201836 mappingsISO 22301:2019 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 22000:201832 mappingsISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 22000:201831 mappingsISO 50001:2018 - Energy Management Systems vs ISO 22000:201829 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 22000:2018?

ISO 37001:2016 has 41 controls across its framework, while ISO 22000:2018 covers 70 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (78% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leadership – ISO 37001:2016, where 4 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct ISO 22000:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 22000:2018?

Of 41 total ISO 37001:2016 controls, 32 map directly to ISO 22000:2018 controls — representing 78% coverage. The remaining 9 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 37001:2016 to ISO 22000:2018?

9 ISO 37001:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22000:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leadership – ISO 37001:2016 with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 37001:2016 and ISO 22000:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Leadership – ISO 37001:2016 (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.