Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 13485:2016vsISO 19011:2018

See exactly how ISO 13485:2016 controls map to ISO 19011:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

38
Controls Mapped
45
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 13485:2016 maps to ISO 19011:2018 with 24% coverage across 20 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 83 ISO 13485:2016 controls identifies 63 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 83 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 38 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Quality management system – ISO 13485:2016(8 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::4.1General requirements7 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.1General
iso-19011-2018::5.5.1General
iso-19011-2018::6.1General
iso-19011-2018::6.2.1General
iso-19011-2018::6.4.1General
iso-19011-2018::7.1General
iso-19011-2018::7.2.1General
iso-13485-2016::4.2.5Control of records
iso-19011-2018::5.5.7Managing and maintaining audit programme records

Management responsibility – ISO 13485:2016(7 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::5.3Quality policy
iso-19011-2018::6.3.2Audit planning
iso-13485-2016::5.4Planning
iso-19011-2018::5.4Establishing the audit programme
iso-13485-2016::5.4.1Quality objectives2 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.2Establishing audit programme objectives
iso-19011-2018::6.4.5Audit information availability and access
iso-13485-2016::5.6Management review
iso-19011-2018::5.5.6Managing audit programme results
iso-13485-2016::5.6.2Review input2 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.7Reviewing and improving audit programme
iso-19011-2018::6.4.6Reviewing documented information while conducting audit

Resource management – ISO 13485:2016(1 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::6.1Provision of resources
iso-19011-2018::5.4.4Determining audit programme resources

Product realization – ISO 13485:2016(4 mappings)

iso-13485-2016::7.1Planning of product realization
iso-19011-2018::7.5Conducting auditor evaluation
iso-13485-2016::7.3.10Design and development files
iso-19011-2018::5.5.5Assigning responsibility for an individual audit to the audit team leader
iso-13485-2016::7.3.2Design and development planning
iso-19011-2018::6.3.2Audit planning
iso-13485-2016::7.3.3Design and development inputs
iso-19011-2018::5.5.3Selecting and determining audit methods

+18 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 19011:2018?

ISO 13485:2016 has 83 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011:2018 covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 20 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016, where 25 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct ISO 19011:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 19011:2018?

Of 83 total ISO 13485:2016 controls, 20 map directly to ISO 19011:2018 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 63 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 13485:2016 to ISO 19011:2018?

63 ISO 13485:2016 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 13485:2016 and ISO 19011:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Product realization – ISO 13485:2016 (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.