Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 22000:2018vsISO 19011:2018

See exactly how ISO 22000:2018 controls map to ISO 19011:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 22000:2018 maps to ISO 19011:2018 with 23% coverage across 16 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 70 ISO 22000:2018 controls identifies 54 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation – ISO 22000:2018.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 70 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Context of the organization – ISO 22000:2018(1 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::4.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-19011-2018::7.6Maintaining and improving auditor competence

Leadership – ISO 22000:2018(6 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::5.2Policy
iso-19011-2018::6.7Conducting audit follow-up
iso-22000-2018::5.2.1Establishing the food safety policy4 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.2Establishing audit programme objectives
iso-19011-2018::5.4Establishing the audit programme
iso-19011-2018::5.4.3Establishing extent of audit programme
iso-19011-2018::7.3Establishing auditor evaluation criteria
iso-22000-2018::5.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
iso-19011-2018::6.4.2Assigning roles and responsibilities of guides and observers

Planning – ISO 22000:2018(2 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::6.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-19011-2018::5.3Determining and evaluating audit programme risks and opportunities
iso-22000-2018::6.3Planning of changes
iso-19011-2018::6.3Preparing audit activities

Support – ISO 22000:2018(11 mappings)

iso-22000-2018::7.1.2People7 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.5.4Selecting audit team members
iso-19011-2018::6.4.3Conducting opening meeting
iso-19011-2018::6.5.2Distributing audit report
iso-19011-2018::6.7Conducting audit follow-up
iso-19011-2018::7.2.2Personal behaviour
iso-19011-2018::7.2.3Knowledge and skills
iso-19011-2018::7.2.4Achieving auditor competence
iso-22000-2018::7.2Competence
iso-19011-2018::5.4.2Competence of individual(s) managing audit programme
iso-22000-2018::7.4Communication
iso-19011-2018::6.4.4Communicating during audit
iso-22000-2018::7.5.1General
iso-19011-2018::5.5.1General
iso-22000-2018::7.5.2Creating and updating
iso-19011-2018::6.4.8Generating audit findings

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 19011:2018?

ISO 22000:2018 has 70 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011:2018 covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 16 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation – ISO 22000:2018, where 20 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct ISO 19011:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 19011:2018?

Of 70 total ISO 22000:2018 controls, 16 map directly to ISO 19011:2018 controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 54 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 22000:2018 to ISO 19011:2018?

54 ISO 22000:2018 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation – ISO 22000:2018 with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 22000:2018 and ISO 19011:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation – ISO 22000:2018 (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.