Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27701:2019vsISO 19011:2018

See exactly how ISO 27701:2019 controls map to ISO 19011:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

55
Controls Mapped
81
Gaps Found
24%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27701:2019 maps to ISO 19011:2018 with 24% coverage across 32 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 136 ISO 27701:2019 controls identifies 104 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002 – ISO 27701:2019.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 136 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 55 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

PIMS-specific requirements related to ISO/IEC 27001 – ISO 27701:2019(20 mappings)

iso-27701-2019::5.1General3 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.1General
iso-19011-2018::6.1General
iso-19011-2018::7.1General
iso-27701-2019::5.2Context of the organization
iso-19011-2018::7.5Conducting auditor evaluation
iso-27701-2019::5.2.1Understanding the organization and its context
iso-19011-2018::7.6Maintaining and improving auditor competence
iso-27701-2019::5.2.3Determining the scope of the information security management system
iso-19011-2018::5.5.2Defining the objectives, scope and criteria for an individual audit
iso-27701-2019::5.3.3Organizational roles, responsibilities and authorities
iso-19011-2018::6.4.2Assigning roles and responsibilities of guides and observers
iso-27701-2019::5.4.1Actions to address risks and opportunities
iso-19011-2018::5.3Determining and evaluating audit programme risks and opportunities
iso-27701-2019::5.5.2Competence
iso-19011-2018::5.4.2Competence of individual(s) managing audit programme
iso-27701-2019::5.5.4Communication
iso-19011-2018::6.4.4Communicating during audit
iso-27701-2019::5.7Performance evaluation
iso-19011-2018::7.5Conducting auditor evaluation
iso-27701-2019::5.7.2Internal audit8 targets
iso-19011-2018::5.5.2Defining the objectives, scope and criteria for an individual audit
iso-19011-2018::6.2Initiating audit
iso-19011-2018::6.2.2Establishing contact with auditee
iso-19011-2018::6.2.3Determining feasibility of audit
iso-19011-2018::6.3.3Assigning work to audit team
iso-19011-2018::6.6Completing audit
iso-19011-2018::7.2.2Personal behaviour
iso-19011-2018::7.4Selecting appropriate auditor evaluation method
iso-27701-2019::5.7.3Management review
iso-19011-2018::5.5.6Managing audit programme results

+35 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27701:2019 and ISO 19011:2018?

ISO 27701:2019 has 136 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011:2018 covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 32 overlapping controls (24% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002 – ISO 27701:2019, where 37 ISO 27701:2019 controls have no direct ISO 19011:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27701:2019 and ISO 19011:2018?

Of 136 total ISO 27701:2019 controls, 32 map directly to ISO 19011:2018 controls — representing 24% coverage. The remaining 104 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27701:2019 to ISO 19011:2018?

104 ISO 27701:2019 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002 – ISO 27701:2019 with 37 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27701:2019 and ISO 19011:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is PIMS-specific guidance related to ISO/IEC 27002 – ISO 27701:2019 (37 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.