TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27005:2022vsISO 19011:2018

See exactly how ISO 27005:2022 controls map to ISO 19011:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27005:2022 maps to ISO 19011:2018 with 18% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27005:2022 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022(1 mappings)

iso-27005-2022::10.5Monitoring and review
→iso-19011-2018::5.6Monitoring audit programme

Context establishment – ISO 27005:2022(4 mappings)

iso-27005-2022::6.4Establishing and maintaining information security risk criteria
→iso-19011-2018::7.3Establishing auditor evaluation criteria
iso-27005-2022::6.4.2Risk acceptance criteria
→iso-19011-2018::7.3Establishing auditor evaluation criteria
iso-27005-2022::6.5Choosing an appropriate method2 targets
→iso-19011-2018::5.5.3Selecting and determining audit methods
→iso-19011-2018::7.4Selecting appropriate auditor evaluation method

Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022(8 mappings)

iso-27005-2022::7.3Analysing information security risks
→iso-19011-2018::5.5.5Assigning responsibility for an individual audit to the audit team leader
iso-27005-2022::7.3.2Assessing potential consequences
→iso-19011-2018::7.2.5Achieving audit team leader competence
iso-27005-2022::7.3.3Assessing likelihood
→iso-19011-2018::5.5.5Assigning responsibility for an individual audit to the audit team leader
iso-27005-2022::7.3.4Determining the levels of risk5 targets
→iso-19011-2018::5.3Determining and evaluating audit programme risks and opportunities
→iso-19011-2018::5.4.4Determining audit programme resources
→iso-19011-2018::6.2.3Determining feasibility of audit
→iso-19011-2018::6.4.9Determining audit conclusions
→iso-19011-2018::7.2Determining auditor competence

Related Comparisons

Other ISO 27005:2022 comparisons

ISO 27005:2022 vs ISO 14004:201613 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs ISO 31000:201810 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs ISO 13485:20169 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs ISO 27701:20199 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20178 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs AS9100D - Aerospace Quality Management System8 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs ISO 55001:20147 mappingsISO 27005:2022 vs ISO 45001:20187 mappings

Other ISO 19011:2018 comparisons

ISO 14001:2015 vs ISO 19011:201846 mappingsISO 14004:2016 vs ISO 19011:201843 mappingsISO 31000:2018 vs ISO 19011:201842 mappingsISO 45001:2018 vs ISO 19011:201839 mappingsISO 27701:2019 vs ISO 19011:201833 mappingsISO 37301:2021 vs ISO 19011:201833 mappingsISO 13485:2016 vs ISO 19011:201833 mappingsISO 22000:2018 vs ISO 19011:201831 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 723 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO 19011:2018?

ISO 27005:2022 has 45 controls across its framework, while ISO 19011:2018 covers 55 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022, where 12 ISO 27005:2022 controls have no direct ISO 19011:2018 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO 19011:2018?

Of 45 total ISO 27005:2022 controls, 8 map directly to ISO 19011:2018 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005:2022 to ISO 19011:2018?

37 ISO 27005:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 19011:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022 with 12 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO 19011:2018?

The domain with the highest gap count is Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022 (12 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.