ISO 27005:2022vsISO 31000:2018
See exactly how ISO 27005:2022 controls map to ISO 31000:2018. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27005:2022 maps to ISO 31000:2018 with 22% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27005:2022 controls identifies 35 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 10 of 10 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.
Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022(6 mappings)
Context establishment – ISO 27005:2022(1 mappings)
Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022(2 mappings)
Information security risk treatment process – ISO 27005:2022(1 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27005:2022 comparisons
Other ISO 31000:2018 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 723 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO 31000:2018?
ISO 27005:2022 has 45 controls across its framework, while ISO 31000:2018 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (22% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022, where 9 ISO 27005:2022 controls have no direct ISO 31000:2018 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO 31000:2018?
Of 45 total ISO 27005:2022 controls, 10 map directly to ISO 31000:2018 controls — representing 22% coverage. The remaining 35 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005:2022 to ISO 31000:2018?
35 ISO 27005:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 31000:2018. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO 31000:2018?
The domain with the highest gap count is Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.