Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27005:2022vsISO/IEC 27003:2017

See exactly how ISO 27005:2022 controls map to ISO/IEC 27003:2017. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

22
Controls Mapped
23
Gaps Found
18%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27005:2022 maps to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 with 18% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 45 ISO 27005:2022 controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 45 controls analysed | 723 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 22 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 723 frameworks.

Leveraging related ISMS processes – ISO 27005:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27005-2022::10.2Leadership and commitment3 targets
27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
AS9100D-5.1Leadership and Commitment
ISO27003-5.1Leadership and Commitment
iso-27005-2022::10.3Communication and consultation2 targets
27003-7.4Communication
ISO27003-7.4Communication
iso-27005-2022::10.4Documented information3 targets
27003-7.5Documented Information
AS9100D-7.5Documented Information
ISO27003-7.5Documented Information
iso-27005-2022::10.4.2Documented information about processes3 targets
27003-7.5Documented Information
AS9100D-7.5Documented Information
ISO27003-7.5Documented Information
iso-27005-2022::10.4.3Documented information about results3 targets
27003-7.5Documented Information
AS9100D-7.5Documented Information
ISO27003-7.5Documented Information
iso-27005-2022::10.6Management review3 targets
27003-9.3Management Review
AS9100D-9.3Management Review
ISO27003-9.3Management Review
iso-27005-2022::10.8Continual improvement3 targets
27003-10.2Continual Improvement
AS9100D-10.3Continual Improvement
ISO27003-10.1Continual Improvement

+2 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 723 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 723 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 723 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

ISO 27005:2022 has 45 controls across its framework, while ISO/IEC 27003:2017 covers 72 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (18% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022, where 11 ISO 27005:2022 controls have no direct ISO/IEC 27003:2017 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

Of 45 total ISO 27005:2022 controls, 8 map directly to ISO/IEC 27003:2017 controls — representing 18% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27005:2022 to ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

37 ISO 27005:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO/IEC 27003:2017. The highest concentration of gaps is in Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022 with 11 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27005:2022 and ISO/IEC 27003:2017?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information security risk assessment process – ISO 27005:2022 (11 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.