Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27002:2022vsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
92
Gaps Found
1%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27002:2022 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27002:2022 maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 1% coverage across 1 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 94 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 93 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 94 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 1 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Physical controls – ISO 27002:2022(2 mappings)

iso-27002-2022::7.10Storage media2 targets
03.08.01Media Storage
03.08.01Media Storage
Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27002:2022 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing ISO 27002:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27002:2022 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into ISO 27002:2022
57%

53 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 40 are genuine gaps.

54.1%Organizational controls
58.8%Technological controls
57.1%Physical controls
62.5%People controls
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 134 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 5.1 Policies for information security

Requires documented, disseminated, periodically reviewed security policy and procedures for every requirement family.

Grounded in 03.15.01 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 5.12 Classification of information

Requires information to be classified according to the organisation's information security needs, judged on confidentiality, integrity and availability and on the requirements of relevant interested parties.

Every one of the 53 evidenced controls and 40 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 to ISO 27002:2022
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 1% in the header counts how many ISO 27002:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

ISO 27002:2022 has 94 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 1 overlapping controls (1% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022, where 33 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

Of 94 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 1 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 1% coverage. The remaining 93 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

93 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022 with 33 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

The domain with the highest gap count is Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022 (33 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.