Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

157
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
0%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 0% coverage across 77 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 29 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 157 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

DE - Detect(20 mappings)

NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities3 targets
03.03.05Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
03.06.01Incident Handling
03.14.06System Monitoring
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03Information is correlated from multiple sources2 targets
03.03.01Event Logging
03.03.06Audit Record Reduction and Report Generation
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-04Estimated impact and scope of adverse events are understood2 targets
03.06.01Incident Handling
03.11.01Risk Assessment
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-06Information on adverse events is provided to authorized staff3 targets
03.03.05Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
03.06.02Incident Monitoring, Reporting, and Response Assistance
03.14.03Security Alerts, Advisories, and Directives
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-07Cyber threat intelligence and contextual information are integrated into analysis
03.14.03Security Alerts, Advisories, and Directives
NIST-CSF-DE.AE-08Incidents are declared when adverse events meet defined criteria
03.06.01Incident Handling
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-01Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events2 targets
03.13.01Boundary Protection
03.14.06System Monitoring
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-02The physical environment is monitored to find potentially adverse events
03.10.02Monitoring Physical Access
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-03Personnel activity and technology usage are monitored to find potentially adverse events2 targets
03.01.01Account Management
03.03.05Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-06External service provider activities are monitored to find potentially adverse events
03.16.03External System Services
NIST-CSF-DE.CM-09Computing hardware and software are monitored to find potentially adverse events2 targets
03.03.04Response to Audit Logging Process Failures
03.11.02Vulnerability Monitoring and Scanning

+137 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
46.4%

45 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. 52 are genuine gaps.

80%03.04 CM (Configuration Management)
50%03.05 IA (Identification and Authentication)
80%03.06 IR (Incident Response)
18.8%03.01 AC (Access Control)
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 105 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 03.01.01 Account Management

Managing identities and credentials for users, services and hardware is account management.

Grounded in NIST-CSF-PR.AA-01 Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 03.01.03 Information Flow Enforcement

Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI within the system and between connected systems.

Every one of the 45 evidenced controls and 52 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
48.1%

51 of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 55 are genuine gaps.

81.8%PR - Protect
61.9%ID - Identify
63.6%DE - Detect
25%GV - Govern
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 134 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: NIST-CSF-DE.AE-02 Potentially adverse events are analyzed to better understand associated activities

Audit record review and analysis for inappropriate or unusual activity is the analysis of adverse events.

Grounded in 03.03.05 Audit Record Review, Analysis, and Reporting. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: NIST-CSF-DE.AE-03 Information is correlated from multiple sources

Information is correlated from multiple sources. Control from NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 framework, domain: DE - Detect.

Every one of the 51 evidenced controls and 55 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 0% in the header counts how many NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 77 overlapping controls (0% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 14 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 77 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 0% coverage. The remaining 29 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

29 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 14 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (14 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.