Cross-Framework Mapping

ISO 27001:2022vsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

See exactly how ISO 27001:2022 controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

169
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
80%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

ISO 27001:2022 maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 80% coverage across 74 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls identifies 26 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Technological controls – ISO 27001:2022.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 93 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 169 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Organizational controls – ISO 27001:2022(20 mappings)

iso-27001-2022::5.1Policies for information security
03.15.01Policy and Procedures
iso-27001-2022::5.10Acceptable use of information and other associated assets2 targets
03.08.07Media Use
03.15.03Rules of Behavior
iso-27001-2022::5.11Return of assets
03.09.02Personnel Termination and Transfer
iso-27001-2022::5.12Classification of information
03.01.22Publicly Accessible Content
iso-27001-2022::5.13Labelling of information
03.08.04Media Marking
iso-27001-2022::5.14Information transfer3 targets
03.08.05Media Transport
03.12.05Information Exchange
03.13.08Transmission Confidentiality and Integrity
iso-27001-2022::5.15Access control3 targets
03.01.02Access Enforcement
03.01.05Least Privilege
03.10.01Physical Access Authorizations
iso-27001-2022::5.16Identity management4 targets
03.01.01Account Management
03.05.01User Identification and Authentication
03.05.02Device Identification and Authentication
03.05.05Identifier Management
iso-27001-2022::5.17Authentication information2 targets
03.05.07Password Management
03.05.12Authenticator Management
iso-27001-2022::5.18Access rights2 targets
03.01.01Account Management
03.01.05Least Privilege

+149 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The ISO 27001:2022 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing ISO 27001:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

ISO 27001:2022 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
62.9%

61 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 36 are genuine gaps.

75%03.01 AC (Access Control)
80%03.04 CM (Configuration Management)
71.4%03.08 MP (Media Protection)
50%03.05 IA (Identification and Authentication)
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 134 candidate mappings were examined and 6 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 03.01.01 Account Management

Access rights are provisioned, reviewed and revoked under a documented process.

Grounded in iso-27001-2022::5.18 Access rights. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 03.01.03 Information Flow Enforcement

Enforce approved authorizations for controlling the flow of CUI within the system and between connected systems.

Every one of the 61 evidenced controls and 36 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into ISO 27001:2022
58.1%

54 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 39 are genuine gaps.

64.9%Organizational controls
55.9%Technological controls
42.9%Physical controls
62.5%People controls
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 148 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 5.1 Policies for information security

Requires documented, disseminated and periodically reviewed security policy and procedures per control family.

Grounded in 03.15.01 Policy and Procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 5.12 Classification of information

Classify information by confidentiality, integrity, availability and interested-party requirements.

Every one of the 54 evidenced controls and 39 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

ISO 27001:2022 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 80% in the header counts how many ISO 27001:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

ISO 27001:2022 has 93 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 74 overlapping controls (80% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Technological controls – ISO 27001:2022, where 9 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.

How many controls map between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

Of 93 total ISO 27001:2022 controls, 74 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 80% coverage. The remaining 26 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27001:2022 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

26 ISO 27001:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in Technological controls – ISO 27001:2022 with 9 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27001:2022 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

The domain with the highest gap count is Technological controls – ISO 27001:2022 (9 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.