ISO 27002:2022vsSOC 2
See exactly how ISO 27002:2022 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 27002:2022 maps to SOC 2 with 89% coverage across 93 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 104 ISO 27002:2022 controls identifies 11 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 104 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 374 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
Organizational controls – ISO 27002:2022(20 mappings)
+354 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The ISO 27002:2022 to SOC 2 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing ISO 27002:2022 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
28 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27002:2022. 33 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Capacity management monitors and plans resource use against demand.
Grounded in iso-27002-2022::8.6 Capacity management. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values
Every one of the 28 evidenced controls and 33 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
45 of 93 ISO 27002:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 48 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Policy deployment of control activities is the evidence an assessor wants for security policies.
Grounded in SOC2-CC5.3 COSO principle 12: Deploys control activities through policies and procedures. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Requires rules for acceptable use, and procedures for handling information and its associated assets, to be identified, documented and put into effect.
Every one of the 45 evidenced controls and 48 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 89% in the header counts how many ISO 27002:2022 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 27002:2022 comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 27002:2022 and SOC 2?
ISO 27002:2022 has 104 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 93 overlapping controls (89% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022, where 6 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 27002:2022 and SOC 2?
Of 104 total ISO 27002:2022 controls, 93 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 89% coverage. The remaining 11 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 27002:2022 to SOC 2?
11 ISO 27002:2022 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022 with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 27002:2022 and SOC 2?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 0 – ISO 27002:2022 (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.