Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsNIST SP 800-171 Rev 3

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

201
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
67%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 with 67% coverage across 132 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 65 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 201 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(5 mappings)

CCM-A&A-01Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures
03.15.01Policy and Procedures
CCM-A&A-02Independent Assessments
03.12.01Security Assessment
CCM-A&A-05Audit Management Process2 targets
03.12.01Security Assessment
03.12.02Plan of Action and Milestones
CCM-A&A-06Remediation
03.12.02Plan of Action and Milestones

AIS - Application & Interface Security(4 mappings)

CCM-AIS-04Secure Application Design and Development
03.16.01Security Engineering Principles
CCM-AIS-05Automated Application Security Testing
03.04.04Impact Analyses
CCM-AIS-06Automated Secure Application Deployment
03.04.03Configuration Change Control
CCM-AIS-07Application Vulnerability Remediation
03.14.01Flaw Remediation

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

CCM-BCR-08Backup
03.08.09System Backup - Cryptographic Protection

CCC - Change Control & Configuration Management(9 mappings)

CCM-CCC-01Change Management Policy and Procedures
03.15.01Policy and Procedures
CCM-CCC-02Quality Testing3 targets
03.04.01Baseline Configuration
03.04.03Configuration Change Control
03.04.04Impact Analyses
CCM-CCC-03Change Management Technology2 targets
03.04.03Configuration Change Control
03.04.04Impact Analyses
CCM-CCC-04Unauthorized Change Protection
03.04.05Access Restrictions for Change
CCM-CCC-06Change Management Baseline
03.04.01Baseline Configuration
CCM-CCC-08Exception Management
03.04.02Configuration Settings

CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(1 mappings)

CCM-CEK-01Encryption and Key Management Policy and Procedures
03.15.01Policy and Procedures

+181 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 lands at 64.9%, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 42.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3, the other asks the reverse.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
64.9%

63 of 97 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 34 are genuine gaps.

56.2%03.01 AC (Access Control)
80%03.04 CM (Configuration Management)
75%03.03 AU (Audit and Accountability)
60%03.13 SC (System and Communications Protection)
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 128 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: 03.01.01 Account Management

Provisioning process authorises, records and communicates each account grant.

Grounded in CCM-IAM-06 User Access Provisioning. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: 03.01.07 Least Privilege - Privileged Functions

Prevent non-privileged users from executing privileged functions; log execution of privileged functions.

Every one of the 63 evidenced controls and 34 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
42.6%

84 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. 113 are genuine gaps.

81.2%IAM - Identity & Access Management
69.2%HRS - Human Resources Security
69.2%LOG - Logging & Monitoring
53.3%DCS - Datacenter Security
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-19. 169 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-A&A-06 Remediation

POAM documents, owns and tracks assessment findings to closure with due dates.

Grounded in 03.12.02 Plan of Action and Milestones. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Maintain approved audit and assurance policies, procedures and standards that are documented, communicated to the staff they bind, applied in practice, and reassessed at least once a year.

Every one of the 84 evidenced controls and 113 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 67% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 covers 97 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 132 overlapping controls (67% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 13 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 132 map directly to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3 controls, representing 67% coverage. The remaining 65 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

65 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-171 Rev 3?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.