Cross-Framework Mapping

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and DefencevsISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement

See exactly how AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls map to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

11
Controls Mapped
27
Gaps Found
16%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence maps to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement with 16% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 38 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls identifies 32 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Operation (Clause 8).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 38 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 11 of 11 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Performance Evaluation and Improvement (Clauses 9–10)(3 mappings)

10.2Nonconformity and Corrective Action
ISO-20400-6.5Monitoring and continuous improvement
9.2Network Domain Security2 targets
ISO-20400-4.2Principles of sustainable procurement
ISO-20400-7.2Integrating sustainability into specifications

Operation (Clause 8)(8 mappings)

AS9100D-8.1Operational Planning and Control
ISO-20400-4.5Key considerations for sustainable procurement
AS9100D-8.4Control of Externally Provided Processes, Products, and Services3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning
ISO27003-8.1Operational Planning and Control3 targets
ISO-20400-7.3Supplier selection
ISO-20400-7.4Contract management and review
ISO-20400-7.5Reviewing and learning
ISO27003-8.3Information Security Risk Treatment
ISO-20400-4.5Key considerations for sustainable procurement

Related Comparisons

Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons

Other ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence has 38 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement covers 19 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Operation (Clause 8), where 10 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement equivalent.

How many controls map between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

Of 38 total AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls, 6 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 32 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence to ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

32 AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in Operation (Clause 8) with 10 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence and ISO 20400:2017 — Sustainable Procurement?

The domain with the highest gap count is Operation (Clause 8) (10 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.