ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and CompetencevsISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement
See exactly how ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls map to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence maps to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement with 14% coverage across 11 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 77 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls identifies 66 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Clause 7: Process Requirements.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 77 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 20 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.
Resource Requirements(4 mappings)
Annex A(3 mappings)
Clause 5: Structural and Governance Requirements(5 mappings)
Clause 6: Resource Requirements(5 mappings)
Clause 8: Management System Requirements(3 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence comparisons
Other ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 718 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence has 77 controls across its framework, while ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 11 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Clause 7: Process Requirements, where 19 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement equivalent.
How many controls map between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
Of 77 total ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls, 11 map directly to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 66 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence to ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
66 ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement. The highest concentration of gaps is in Clause 7: Process Requirements with 19 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between ISO 15189:2022 - Medical Laboratories Requirements for Quality and Competence and ISO 20400:2017 - Sustainable Procurement?
The domain with the highest gap count is Clause 7: Process Requirements (19 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.