CSA CCM v4vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)
See exactly how CSA CCM v4 controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CSA CCM v4 maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 16% coverage across 28 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 171 CSA CCM v4 controls identifies 143 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 171 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 37 mapped controls across 11 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(5 mappings)
CCC - Change Control and Configuration Management(2 mappings)
CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(6 mappings)
DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(1 mappings)
GRC - Governance, Risk and Compliance(3 mappings)
HRS - Human Resources(1 mappings)
IAM - Identity & Access Management(2 mappings)
+17 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other CSA CCM v4 comparisons
Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CSA CCM v4 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
CSA CCM v4 has 171 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 28 overlapping controls (16% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management, where 18 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.
How many controls map between CSA CCM v4 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
Of 171 total CSA CCM v4 controls, 28 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 16% coverage. The remaining 143 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA CCM v4 to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
143 CSA CCM v4 controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management with 18 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA CCM v4 and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?
The domain with the highest gap count is DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management (18 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.