Cross-Framework Mapping

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)vsHKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)

See exactly how CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls map to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

23
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
80%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) maps to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) with 80% coverage across 12 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls identifies 3 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Data Security and Privacy.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 23 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Threat and Vulnerability Management(10 mappings)

AESCSF-TVM-1Vulnerability Assessment
CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment
AESCSF-TVM-2Threat Intelligence5 targets
CRAF-1.1Cyber Risk Governance
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
CRAF-3.6Third-Party Risk Management
CRAF-4.2Threat Intelligence
CRAF-6.1Cyber Threat Landscape Monitoring
CSA-TVM-01Vulnerability Management
CRAF-4.3Security Testing
CSA-TVM-02Penetration Testing
CRAF-4.3Security Testing
CSA-TVM-03Application Security (DevSecOps)2 targets
CRAF-3.4Application Security
CRAF-4.3Security Testing

Data Security and Privacy(3 mappings)

CSA-DATA-02Encryption and Key Management
CRAF-3.2Data Security
CSA-DATA-03Data Retention and Deletion
CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience
CSA-DATA-04Privacy by Design
CRAF-2.2Risk and Threat Assessment

Infrastructure and Operations Security(7 mappings)

CSA-INF-01Identity and Access Management
CRAF-3.1Access Control
CSA-INF-03Security Monitoring and Logging
CRAF-4.4Anomaly Detection
CSA-INF-04Incident Management5 targets
CRAF-1.2Cyber Risk Strategy
CRAF-1.4Cyber Risk Roles and Responsibilities
CRAF-5.1Incident Response Planning
CRAF-5.2Incident Response Execution
CRAF-5.3Recovery and Resilience

+3 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) comparisons

Other HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) has 15 controls across its framework, while HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 12 overlapping controls (80% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Data Security and Privacy, where 1 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) equivalent.

How many controls map between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

Of 15 total CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls, 12 map directly to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF) controls — representing 80% coverage. The remaining 3 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) to HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

3 CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) controls have no direct equivalent in HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF). The highest concentration of gaps is in Data Security and Privacy with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk) and HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Data Security and Privacy (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.