Cross-Framework Mapping

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6vsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

12
Controls Mapped
4
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 38% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 12 of 12 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

All Farm Base: Management and Organization(4 mappings)

GG-AF-1Site History and Management3 targets
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
GG-AF-3Traceability and Segregation
CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security

All Farm Base: Workers and Resources(6 mappings)

GG-AF-4Workers Health, Safety and Welfare3 targets
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
GG-AF-6Subcontractor Management3 targets
AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards

All Farm Base: Environmental Management(1 mappings)

GG-AF-7Environment and Biodiversity
EU-CRMA-SUS-03Sustainability Standards

Crops Base: Crop Production(1 mappings)

GG-CB-1Propagation Material
CTPAT-SCS-03Conveyance and Cargo Security

Related Comparisons

Other GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 comparisons

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 has 16 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling, where 3 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 16 total GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls, 6 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

10 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.