GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6vsAS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence
See exactly how GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls map to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 maps to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence with 38% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 17 of 17 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
All Farm Base: Management and Organization(8 mappings)
All Farm Base: Workers and Resources(3 mappings)
Crops Base: Crop Production(6 mappings)
Related Comparisons
Other GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 comparisons
Other AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 has 16 controls across its framework, while AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence covers 38 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling, where 3 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls have no direct AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence equivalent.
How many controls map between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
Of 16 total GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls, 6 map directly to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 to AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
10 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls have no direct equivalent in AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence. The highest concentration of gaps is in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence?
The domain with the highest gap count is Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.