TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023)vsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

34
Controls Mapped
16
Gaps Found
26%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 26% coverage across 13 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 50 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls identifies 37 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 50 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 34 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Information Security(20 mappings)

38.1051(a)General Security Requirements for DCMs3 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
39.18(a)General Security Requirements for DCOs3 targets
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
DSPF-INFO-3Information Access Controls3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
EIOPA-GL-13Information Security Training and Awareness
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
EIOPA-GL-8Logical Security2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
TISAX-IS-03Third-Party Risk Management3 targets
→AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards

+14 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) comparisons

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Defence Security Principles Framework (DSPF)22 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CSA CCM v421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 202421 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs South Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP)21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange21 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)20 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation20 mappings

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)12 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsWCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) has 50 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 13 overlapping controls (26% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 25 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 50 total EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls, 13 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 26% coverage. The remaining 37 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

37 EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 25 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (25 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.