TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT SecurityvsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

18
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 38% coverage across 8 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 21 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in OT Incident Response.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 21 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 18 of 18 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

OT Security Controls(5 mappings)

NIST82-CTL-01OT Access Control3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
NIST82-CTL-02OT Authentication and Credential Management
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
NIST82-CTL-07OT Backup and Recovery
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity

OT Incident Response(1 mappings)

NIST82-IR-04OT System Recovery
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity

OT System Overview and Threats(9 mappings)

NIST82-OVR-03OT Threat Assessment5 targets
→AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
NIST82-OVR-04OT Vulnerability Assessment4 targets
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
→NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management

OT Risk Management(3 mappings)

NIST82-RM-01OT-Specific Risk Management Framework2 targets
→NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
→WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
NIST82-RM-05OT Security Training and Awareness
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

Related Comparisons

Other NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security comparisons

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CISA ICS-CERT Advisories and Industrial Control Systems Security Guidelines17 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.016 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs API 116416 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs IEC 6244316 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs DO-326A / ED-202A16 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs CSA CCM v416 mappings

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)12 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsWCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security has 21 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 8 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in OT Incident Response, where 4 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 21 total NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls, 8 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

13 NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in OT Incident Response with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is OT Incident Response (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.