Cross-Framework Mapping

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07)vsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

21
Controls Mapped
5
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 38% coverage across 10 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 26 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in 3.4 Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 26 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 21 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

3.2 Governance and Strategy(3 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.2.3Use of Third-Party Providers3 targets
AEO-SC-4Trading Partner Security
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
NRF-5Third-Party Partner Standards

3.3 ICT and Security Risk Management Framework(8 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.3.1Risk Management Framework2 targets
NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
EBA-GL-3.3.2Risk Identification3 targets
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management
EBA-GL-3.3.3Risk Assessment3 targets
NRF-4Supply Chain Risk Identification
WCO-SAFE-SCS-01Advance Electronic Information
WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management

3.4 Information Security(6 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.4.2Logical Security3 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
EBA-GL-3.4.3Physical Security2 targets
AEO-SC-3Premises Security
CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
EBA-GL-3.4.7Information Security Training
CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

3.6 ICT Project and Change Management(2 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.6.1ICT Project Management2 targets
NRF-6Vendor Risk Management
WCO-SAFE-SCS-02Risk Management

3.7 Business Continuity Management(1 mappings)

EBA-GL-3.7.4Response and Recovery Plans
EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity

+1 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) comparisons

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) has 26 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 10 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in 3.4 Information Security, where 4 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 26 total EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls, 10 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

16 EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in 3.4 Information Security with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between EBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is 3.4 Information Security (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.