TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FedRAMP Rev 5vsCritical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)

See exactly how FedRAMP Rev 5 controls map to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

32
Controls Mapped
32
Gaps Found
23%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FedRAMP Rev 5 maps to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) with 23% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 64 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls identifies 49 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Access Control and Authentication.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 64 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 32 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

System Protection and Communications(4 mappings)

3.10Physical and Environmental Protection3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
FEDRAMP-CP-9System Backup
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity

Access Control and Authentication(10 mappings)

CJIS-5Identification and Authentication
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
ICS-AC-1Role-based access control2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
ICS-AC-2Authentication mechanisms
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security
ICS-AC-4Physical access controls3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
NIS2-IA-11Access Control Policy2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
NIS2-IA-12Multi-Factor Authentication
→CTPAT-SCS-02Personnel Security

Incident Response and Maintenance(1 mappings)

FEDRAMP-IR-4Incident Handling
→EU-CRMA-SUS-01Recycling and Circularity

Personnel, Planning and Governance(5 mappings)

FEDRAMP-PE-3Physical Access Control3 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security
→UKTSA-SC-04Third-Party Access Controls
FEDRAMP-PE-6Monitoring Physical Access2 targets
→AEO-SC-3Premises Security
→CTPAT-SCS-01Physical Security

+12 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever — no credit card required

Related Comparisons

Other FedRAMP Rev 5 comparisons

FedRAMP Rev 5 vs South Korea ISMS-P37 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation35 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs TISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange35 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CSA CCM v434 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs ASD Information Security Manual (ISM)34 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs CSA STAR (Security, Trust, Assurance, and Risk)33 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs NIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security33 mappingsFedRAMP Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments33 mappings

Other Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)12 mappingsEBA Guidelines on ICT and Security Risk Management (EBA/GL/2024/07) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsCFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsEIOPA Guidelines on ICT Security and Governance (2023) vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Rev 3 — Guide to OT Security vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIS2 Directive Implementing Acts vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsNIST Privacy Framework 1.0 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappingsWCO Authorised Economic Operator (AEO) Framework vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)11 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FedRAMP Rev 5 and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

FedRAMP Rev 5 has 64 controls across its framework, while Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) covers 28 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (23% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control and Authentication, where 13 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) equivalent.

How many controls map between FedRAMP Rev 5 and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

Of 64 total FedRAMP Rev 5 controls, 15 map directly to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192) controls — representing 23% coverage. The remaining 49 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FedRAMP Rev 5 to Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

49 FedRAMP Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192). The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control and Authentication with 13 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FedRAMP Rev 5 and Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control and Authentication (13 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.