TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6vsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements

See exactly how GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls map to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 maps to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements with 38% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 16 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls identifies 10 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 16 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

All Farm Base: Management and Organization(6 mappings)

GG-AF-1Site History and Management
→3.11Risk Assessment
GG-AF-2Record Keeping and Internal Self-Assessment2 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.3.1Audit Event Assessment
GG-AF-3Traceability and Segregation3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits

All Farm Base: Workers and Resources(4 mappings)

GG-AF-4Workers Health, Safety and Welfare
→3.11Risk Assessment
GG-AF-6Subcontractor Management3 targets
→3.16System and Services Acquisition
→3.17Supply Chain Risk Management
→3.5Management of Suppliers

Crops Base: Crop Production(3 mappings)

GG-CB-1Propagation Material3 targets
→3.1Food Safety and Quality Manual
→3.2Document Control
→3.4Internal Audits

Related Comparisons

Other GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 comparisons

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs AS9100D:2016 — Quality Management Systems for Aviation, Space, and Defence6 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs SQF Code Edition 9 — Safe Quality Food6 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs AS9100D — Aerospace Quality Management System6 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs ISO/IEC 27003:20176 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs Critical Raw Materials Act (Proposed Regulation COM(2023) 192)6 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs CDP (formerly Carbon Disclosure Project)6 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs C-TPAT — Customs-Trade Partnership Against Terrorism5 mappingsGLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 vs 3GPP Security Architecture (TS 33.501 — 5G Security)5 mappings

Other NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements comparisons

UK Telecommunications (Security) Act 2021 vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsSouth Korea Cloud Security Assurance Program (CSAP) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsCanada ITSG-33 — IT Security Risk Management vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNew Zealand Information Security Manual (NZISM) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsMARS-E — Minimum Acceptable Risk Standards for Exchanges vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsNRC 10 CFR 73.54 — Nuclear Facility Cybersecurity vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements21 mappingsTISAX — Trusted Information Security Assessment Exchange vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements20 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 693 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 has 16 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements covers 35 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling, where 3 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements equivalent.

How many controls map between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

Of 16 total GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls, 6 map directly to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 10 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 to NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

10 GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements. The highest concentration of gaps is in Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between GLOBALG.A.P. Integrated Farm Assurance (IFA) Standard v6 and NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 — Assessing CUI Security Requirements?

The domain with the highest gap count is Fruit and Vegetables: Product Handling (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.