Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

13
Controls Mapped
36
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 704 frameworks | 359K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 13 of 13 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 359K+ mappings across 704 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(3 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management3 targets
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(1 mappings)

CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
SOCI-S30CUVulnerability assessments

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(5 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy3 targets
SOCI-CIRMP-PHYSICALCIRMP hazard vector: Physical security and natural hazards
SOCI-S30CBStatutory incident response planning
SOCI-S35ABMinisterial authorisation for government assistance
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing2 targets
SOCI-S30BCNotification of critical cyber security incidents (12 hours)
SOCI-S30BDNotification of other cyber security incidents (72 hours)

Inherent Risk Profile: Risk Categories(1 mappings)

CAT-IRP-4Organizational characteristics
SOCI-CIRMP-SUPPLYCIRMP hazard vector: Supply chain

Maturity Levels(3 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving3 targets
SOCI-S30ACObligation to adopt a CIRMP
SOCI-S30ADCompliance with CIRMP
SOCI-S30AEAnnual review of CIRMP

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 704 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 704 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (359K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 6 map directly to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

43 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.