NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0vsSecurity of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)
See exactly how NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls map to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 maps to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) with 14% coverage across 15 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 106 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls identifies 91 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in GV - Govern.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 106 controls analysed | 716 frameworks | 430K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 31 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 430K+ mappings across 716 frameworks.
GV - Govern(11 mappings)
ID - Identify(6 mappings)
PR - Protect(3 mappings)
+11 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 716 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons
Other Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 716 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 716 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (430K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 has 106 controls across its framework, while Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) covers 50 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 15 overlapping controls (14% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in GV - Govern, where 24 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
Of 106 total NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls, 15 map directly to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI) controls — representing 14% coverage. The remaining 91 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 to Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
91 NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI). The highest concentration of gaps is in GV - Govern with 24 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 and Security of Critical Infrastructure Act 2018 (SOCI)?
The domain with the highest gap count is GV - Govern (24 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.