Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsPCI P2PE

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to PCI P2PE. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

15
Controls Mapped
34
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to PCI P2PE with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 15 of 15 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(3 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management3 targets
PCI-P2PE-16Due diligence and onboarding
PCI-P2PE-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
PCI-P2PE-19Concentration risk management

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls2 targets
PCI-P2PE-06Network security and segmentation
PCI-P2PE-07Endpoint protection and detection
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
PCI-P2PE-10Secure configuration standards

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(6 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy3 targets
PCI-P2PE-21Incident detection and classification
PCI-P2PE-22Incident response and containment
PCI-P2PE-25Post-incident review and improvement
CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing3 targets
PCI-P2PE-11Business continuity planning and testing
PCI-P2PE-12Disaster recovery procedures
PCI-P2PE-14Critical service identification

Maturity Levels(3 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving3 targets
PCI-P2PE-16Due diligence and onboarding
PCI-P2PE-18Ongoing monitoring and assessment
PCI-P2PE-19Concentration risk management

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and PCI P2PE?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while PCI P2PE covers 44 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct PCI P2PE equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and PCI P2PE?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 6 map directly to PCI P2PE controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to PCI P2PE?

43 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in PCI P2PE. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and PCI P2PE?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.