TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsPAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

6
Controls Mapped
43
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 12% coverage across 6 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 43 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 6 of 6 mapped controls across 4 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(1 mappings)

CAT-D1-4Training and culture
→PASONE-3Personnel Security, Vetting, Awareness, and Training

Domain 3: Cybersecurity Controls(3 mappings)

CAT-D3-1Preventative controls
→PASONE-4Technical Security: CDE Configuration, BIM Tools, Encryption, Aggregation, Mobile Working
CAT-D3-2Detective controls
→PASONE-4Technical Security: CDE Configuration, BIM Tools, Encryption, Aggregation, Mobile Working
CAT-D3-3Corrective controls
→PASONE-6Incident Management, Audit, Handover, Operational Phase, Decommissioning

Domain 4: External Dependency Management(1 mappings)

CAT-D4-3Third-party access controls
→PASONE-4Technical Security: CDE Configuration, BIM Tools, Encryption, Aggregation, Mobile Working

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(1 mappings)

CAT-D5-1Incident planning and strategy
→PASONE-6Incident Management, Audit, Handover, Operational Phase, Decommissioning

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs HKMA Cyber Resilience Assessment Framework (C-RAF)12 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs O-RAN WG11 Security Specification11 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs ISO 27001:202211 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.010 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs OWASP DevSecOps Maturity Model (DSOMM)10 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST Privacy Framework9 mappingsFFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) vs NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements9 mappings

Other PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons

Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) Release 2024 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsISO 27001:2022 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsNIST SP 1800-32 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsAPI 1164 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsISO 27019 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsISO/IEC 27010:2015 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappingsIEC 62443 vs PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments4 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 6 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 6 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 6 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 43 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

43 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and PAS 1192-5:2015 - Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.