NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5vsPAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments
See exactly how NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls map to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 maps to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments with 19% coverage across 33 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 172 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls identifies 139 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in SC - System and Communications Protection.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 172 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 76 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.
AC - Access Control(9 mappings)
AU - Audit and Accountability(6 mappings)
CA - Assessment, Authorization, and Monitoring(3 mappings)
CM - Configuration Management(2 mappings)
+56 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 693 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever — no credit card required
Related Comparisons
Other NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 comparisons
Other PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 693 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 has 172 controls across its framework, while PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments covers 24 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 33 overlapping controls (19% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in SC - System and Communications Protection, where 15 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments equivalent.
How many controls map between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
Of 172 total NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls, 33 map directly to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments controls — representing 19% coverage. The remaining 139 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 to PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
139 NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 controls have no direct equivalent in PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments. The highest concentration of gaps is in SC - System and Communications Protection with 15 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 and PAS 1192-5:2015 — Security-Minded Approach to BIM and Digital Built Environments?
The domain with the highest gap count is SC - System and Communications Protection (15 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.