Cross-Framework Mapping

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT)vsIRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)

See exactly how FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls map to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
46
Gaps Found
6%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) maps to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) with 6% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls identifies 46 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Inherent Risk Profile.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Domain 1: Cyber Risk Management and Oversight(1 mappings)

CAT-D1-2Risk management
IRM-Process-Identification-Analysis-Evaluation-Treatment-Monitoring-Review-ISO31000-AlignedIRM Risk Management Process - 5-Stage Cycle + Identification + Analysis (Inherent/Residual) + Evaluation + Treatment (4Ts Tolerate/Treat/Transfer/Terminate) + Monitoring + Review + Communication + Risk Register

Domain 5: Cyber Incident Management and Resilience(1 mappings)

CAT-D5-4Resilience planning and testing
IRM-RiskCategories-Strategic-Financial-Operational-Knowledge-FOIL-External-Internal-DownsideUpsideIRM Four Risk Categories - Strategic + Financial + Operational + Knowledge + FOIL Typology + External vs Internal + Downside Threats and Upside Opportunities + Risk Universe

Maturity Levels(1 mappings)

CAT-ML-2Evolving
IRM-Process-Identification-Analysis-Evaluation-Treatment-Monitoring-Review-ISO31000-AlignedIRM Risk Management Process - 5-Stage Cycle + Identification + Analysis (Inherent/Residual) + Evaluation + Treatment (4Ts Tolerate/Treat/Transfer/Terminate) + Monitoring + Review + Communication + Risk Register

Related Comparisons

Other FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) comparisons

Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) has 49 controls across its framework, while IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (6% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Inherent Risk Profile, where 5 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) equivalent.

How many controls map between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

Of 49 total FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls, 3 map directly to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls — representing 6% coverage. The remaining 46 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

46 FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) controls have no direct equivalent in IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). The highest concentration of gaps is in Inherent Risk Profile with 5 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FFIEC Cybersecurity Assessment Tool (CAT) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Inherent Risk Profile (5 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.