Cross-Framework Mapping

PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR)vsIRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)

See exactly how PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) controls map to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

5
Controls Mapped
3
Gaps Found
38%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) maps to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) with 38% coverage across 3 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 8 PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) controls identifies 5 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Deficiency Assessment.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 8 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 5 of 5 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Planning and Risk Assessment(2 mappings)

ASTWO-1Audit Planning, Scaling, Risk Assessment, and Integration2 targets
IRM-Process-Identification-Analysis-Evaluation-Treatment-Monitoring-Review-ISO31000-AlignedIRM Risk Management Process - 5-Stage Cycle + Identification + Analysis (Inherent/Residual) + Evaluation + Treatment (4Ts Tolerate/Treat/Transfer/Terminate) + Monitoring + Review + Communication + Risk Register
IRM-RiskCategories-Strategic-Financial-Operational-Knowledge-FOIL-External-Internal-DownsideUpsideIRM Four Risk Categories - Strategic + Financial + Operational + Knowledge + FOIL Typology + External vs Internal + Downside Threats and Upside Opportunities + Risk Universe

Entity-Level and Period-End(2 mappings)

ASTWO-3Entity-Level Controls and Period-End Financial Reporting Process2 targets
IRM-Process-Identification-Analysis-Evaluation-Treatment-Monitoring-Review-ISO31000-AlignedIRM Risk Management Process - 5-Stage Cycle + Identification + Analysis (Inherent/Residual) + Evaluation + Treatment (4Ts Tolerate/Treat/Transfer/Terminate) + Monitoring + Review + Communication + Risk Register
IRM-RiskCategories-Strategic-Financial-Operational-Knowledge-FOIL-External-Internal-DownsideUpsideIRM Four Risk Categories - Strategic + Financial + Operational + Knowledge + FOIL Typology + External vs Internal + Downside Threats and Upside Opportunities + Risk Universe

Reporting(1 mappings)

ASTWO-8ICFR Opinion, Basis, Definition, Limitations, Combined vs Separate Reports
IRM-RiskCategories-Strategic-Financial-Operational-Knowledge-FOIL-External-Internal-DownsideUpsideIRM Four Risk Categories - Strategic + Financial + Operational + Knowledge + FOIL Typology + External vs Internal + Downside Threats and Upside Opportunities + Risk Universe

Related Comparisons

Other PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) comparisons

Other IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 718 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) has 8 controls across its framework, while IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) covers 7 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 3 overlapping controls (38% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Deficiency Assessment, where 1 PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) controls have no direct IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) equivalent.

How many controls map between PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

Of 8 total PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) controls, 3 map directly to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management) controls — representing 38% coverage. The remaining 5 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) to IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

5 PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) controls have no direct equivalent in IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management). The highest concentration of gaps is in Deficiency Assessment with 1 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between PCAOB AS 2201 - Audit of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (ICFR) and IRM Enterprise Risk Management Framework (Institute of Risk Management)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Deficiency Assessment (1 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.