TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for AviationvsEASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation

See exactly how FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls map to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

3
Controls Mapped
12
Gaps Found
13%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation maps to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation with 13% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 15 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls identifies 13 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in FAA Aviation Cybersecurity: Operator and Maintenance Cybersecurity (Operators + Continued Airworthiness).

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 15 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 3 of 3 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

FAA Aviation Cybersecurity: Operator and Maintenance Cybersecurity (Operators + Continued Airworthiness)(1 mappings)

FAA-CSA-AC119-1Cybersecurity for Operators (FAA AC 119-1)
→IS.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

FAA Aviation Cybersecurity: Supply Chain, Workforce and Coordination with International + Federal Regimes(2 mappings)

FAA-CSA-InternationalCoordination with EASA Part-IS, ICAO AVSEC and International Cybersecurity Frameworks2 targets
→IS.OR.200Information Security Management System (ISMS)
→IS.OR.205Information Security Risk Assessment

Related Comparisons

Other FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation comparisons

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs EU NIS2 Directive - Transport Sector Requirements3 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.01 mappingsFAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation vs ICAO Annex 17 - Aviation Security (AVSEC)1 mappings

Other EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation comparisons

NIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation9 mappingsNRF Cybersecurity and Data Privacy Framework (National Retail Federation) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNIS2 Directive vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsNERC CIP vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsMTCS (Singapore) vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAPI 1164 vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappingsAnnex 11 to EU GMP - Computerised Systems vs EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation8 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation has 15 controls across its framework, while EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation covers 34 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (13% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in FAA Aviation Cybersecurity: Operator and Maintenance Cybersecurity (Operators + Continued Airworthiness), where 3 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation equivalent.

How many controls map between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

Of 15 total FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls, 2 map directly to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation controls — representing 13% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation to EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

13 FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation controls have no direct equivalent in EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation. The highest concentration of gaps is in FAA Aviation Cybersecurity: Operator and Maintenance Cybersecurity (Operators + Continued Airworthiness) with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between FAA Cybersecurity Framework for Aviation and EASA Part-IS - Information Security in Aviation?

The domain with the highest gap count is FAA Aviation Cybersecurity: Operator and Maintenance Cybersecurity (Operators + Continued Airworthiness) (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.