TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense InformationvsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

4
Controls Mapped
8
Gaps Found
33%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 33% coverage across 4 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 12 DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls identifies 8 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in DFARS 7012: Adequate Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 12 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 4 of 4 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

DFARS 7012: Cyber Incident Reporting(1 mappings)

DFARS-7012-cCyber incident reporting (72-hour rapid report)
→NIST-CSF-RS.CO-02Internal and external stakeholders are notified of incidents

DFARS 7012: Malicious Software and Media Preservation(1 mappings)

DFARS-7012-eMedia preservation and protection (90 days)
→NIST-CSF-RS.AN-07Incident data and metadata are collected and their integrity preserved

DFARS 7012: Forensics and Damage Assessment(2 mappings)

DFARS-7012-fAccess to additional information or equipment for forensic analysis
→NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03Analysis is performed to determine what has taken place during an incident
DFARS-7012-gCyber incident damage assessment activities
→NIST-CSF-RS.AN-08Incidents are analyzed to determine root cause

Related Comparisons

Other DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information comparisons

DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information vs NIST SP 800-53 Rev 52 mappingsDFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information vs CMMC 2.02 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

Belgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsNIST SP 800-171A Rev 3 - Assessing CUI Security Requirements vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information has 12 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 4 overlapping controls (33% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in DFARS 7012: Adequate Security, where 3 DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 12 total DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls, 4 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 33% coverage. The remaining 8 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

8 DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in DFARS 7012: Adequate Security with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between DFARS 252.204-7012 - Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is DFARS 7012: Adequate Security (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.