TheArtOfService
Cross-Framework Mapping

Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia)vsNIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0

See exactly how Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) controls map to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

2
Controls Mapped
15
Gaps Found
12%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) maps to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 with 12% coverage across 2 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 17 Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) controls identifies 15 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Cyber Security Act 2024: Regulatory Powers and Interactions.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 17 controls analysed | 718 frameworks | 332K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 2 of 2 mapped controls across 2 domains. Sign up to explore all 332K+ mappings across 718 frameworks.

Cyber Security Act 2024: Cyber Incident Review Board(1 mappings)

AUCSA-CIRB-REVIEWConduct of no-fault post-incident reviews
→NIST-CSF-RS.AN-03Analysis is performed to determine what has taken place during an incident

Cyber Security Act 2024: Ransomware Reporting Obligations(1 mappings)

AUCSA-RAN-RPTRansomware and cyber-extortion payment reporting obligation
→NIST-CSF-RS.AN-06Actions performed during an investigation are recorded

Related Comparisons

Other Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) comparisons

Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) vs Critical Infrastructure Risk Management Program (CIRMP) Rules 20232 mappings

Other NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 comparisons

ISO 27001:2022 vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.082 mappingsBelgium CyberFundamentals vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASIC Cyber Resilience Good Practices vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.032 mappingsASEAN Data Management Framework vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.025 mappingsNIST SP 800-82 Revision 3: Guide to Industrial Control Systems (ICS) Security vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAzure Security Benchmark vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.022 mappingsAustralian Energy Sector Cyber Security Framework (AESCSF) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappingsAWWA Cybersecurity Guidance for the Water Sector (American Water Works Association) vs NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.019 mappings

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 718 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • ✓ 718 framework browser
  • ✓ Cross-framework mappings (332K+)
  • ✓ 824 compliance assessments
  • ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • ✓ Unlimited full-text search
  • ✓ Framework self-assessment
  • ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

Popular framework comparisons

NIST CSF vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs NIST CSFCMMC vs NIST 800-53FedRAMP vs NIST 800-53NIST CSF vs SOC 2HIPAA vs NIST 800-53ISO 27001 vs SOC 2ISO 27001 vs ISO 27701

What are the key differences between Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) has 17 controls across its framework, while NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 covers 106 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 2 overlapping controls (12% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Cyber Security Act 2024: Regulatory Powers and Interactions, where 3 Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) controls have no direct NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 equivalent.

How many controls map between Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

Of 17 total Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) controls, 2 map directly to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 controls — representing 12% coverage. The remaining 15 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) to NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

15 Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) controls have no direct equivalent in NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0. The highest concentration of gaps is in Cyber Security Act 2024: Regulatory Powers and Interactions with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cyber Security Act 2024 (Australia) and NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0?

The domain with the highest gap count is Cyber Security Act 2024: Regulatory Powers and Interactions (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

Related Resources

How to Map Controls Across Frameworks|Multi-Framework Compliance Guide|Compliance Glossary

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.