Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsSOC 2
See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to SOC 2. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which SOC 2 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to SOC 2 with 52% coverage across 103 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 94 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 173 mapped controls across 16 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.
A&A - Audit & Assurance(6 mappings)
AIS - Application & Interface Security(7 mappings)
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(7 mappings)
+153 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to SOC 2 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which SOC 2 controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into SOC 2 lands at 57.4%, while SOC 2 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 37.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for SOC 2, the other asks the reverse.
35 of 61 SOC 2 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 26 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Capacity and resource planning is the same availability capacity requirement.
Grounded in CCM-IVS-02 Capacity and Resource Planning. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Demonstrates a commitment to integrity and ethical values
Every one of the 35 evidenced controls and 26 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
74 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for SOC 2. 123 are genuine gaps.
A sample of what the report says
Ongoing and separate evaluations must be selected, developed and performed.
Grounded in SOC2-CC4.1 COSO principle 16: Selects and develops ongoing and separate evaluations. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.
Confirm during each audit that the organisation meets every standard, regulation, contract clause and statutory obligation inside the audit scope, and record the outcome for each one.
Every one of the 74 evidenced controls and 123 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 52% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many SOC 2 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons
Other SOC 2 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 686 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and SOC 2?
Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while SOC 2 covers 61 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 103 overlapping controls (52% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 20 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct SOC 2 equivalent.
How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and SOC 2?
Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 103 map directly to SOC 2 controls, representing 52% coverage. The remaining 94 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to SOC 2?
94 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in SOC 2. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and SOC 2?
The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.