CMMC 2.0vsAWS Well-Architected Security Pillar
See exactly how CMMC 2.0 controls map to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CMMC 2.0 maps to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar with 70% coverage across 77 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls identifies 33 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Access Control.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 110 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 172 mapped controls across 13 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
Access Control(20 mappings)
+152 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CMMC 2.0 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls your existing CMMC 2.0 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. CMMC 2.0 into AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar lands at 31.7%, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar into CMMC 2.0 lands at 50%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your CMMC 2.0 evidence buys you for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar, the other asks the reverse.
20 of 63 AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CMMC 2.0. 43 are genuine gaps.
55 of 110 CMMC 2.0 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. 55 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 70% in the header counts how many CMMC 2.0 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CMMC 2.0 comparisons
Other AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CMMC 2.0 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
CMMC 2.0 has 110 controls across its framework, while AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar covers 63 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 77 overlapping controls (70% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Access Control, where 8 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar equivalent.
How many controls map between CMMC 2.0 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
Of 110 total CMMC 2.0 controls, 77 map directly to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar controls, representing 70% coverage. The remaining 33 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CMMC 2.0 to AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
33 CMMC 2.0 controls have no direct equivalent in AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar. The highest concentration of gaps is in Access Control with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CMMC 2.0 and AWS Well-Architected Security Pillar?
The domain with the highest gap count is Access Control (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.