Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsGDPR

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

63
Controls Mapped
134
Gaps Found
20%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which GDPR controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to GDPR with 20% coverage across 40 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 157 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 63 mapped controls across 10 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(1 mappings)

CCM-A&A-04Requirements Compliance
GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller

BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(1 mappings)

CCM-BCR-08Backup
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing

CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management(1 mappings)

CCM-CEK-03Data Encryption
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing

DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management(17 mappings)

CCM-DSP-01Security and Privacy Policy and Procedures2 targets
GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
CCM-DSP-02Secure Disposal2 targets
GDPR-Art.17Right to erasure (right to be forgotten)
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
CCM-DSP-03Data Inventory
GDPR-Art.30Records of processing activities
CCM-DSP-04Data Classification
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
CCM-DSP-05Data Flow Documentation
GDPR-Art.30Records of processing activities
CCM-DSP-06Data Ownership and Stewardship2 targets
GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller
GDPR-Art.26Joint controllers
CCM-DSP-07Data Protection by Design and Default
GDPR-Art.25Data protection by design and by default
CCM-DSP-08Data Privacy by Design and Default
GDPR-Art.25Data protection by design and by default
CCM-DSP-09Data Protection Impact Assessment2 targets
GDPR-Art.35Data protection impact assessment
GDPR-Art.36Prior consultation
CCM-DSP-10Sensitive Data Transfer3 targets
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
GDPR-Art.44General principle for transfers
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
CCM-DSP-11Personal Data Access, Reversal, Rectification and Deletion
GDPR-Art.12Transparent information, communication and modalities for rights

+43 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to GDPR crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which GDPR controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into GDPR lands at 35%, while GDPR into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 7.6%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for GDPR, the other asks the reverse.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into GDPR
35%

14 of 40 GDPR controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 26 are genuine gaps.

50%Chapter IV - Controller and Processor
36.4%Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject
14.3%Chapter II - Principles
16.7%Chapter V - Transfers of Personal Data
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 46 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: GDPR-Art.12 Transparent information, communication and modalities for rights

A working route for rights requests, fulfilled as applicable law requires.

Grounded in CCM-DSP-11 Personal Data Access, Reversal, Rectification and Deletion. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: GDPR-Art.10 Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions

Process personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences, or related security measures, only under the control of official authority or where Union or Member State law authorises the processing and provides appropriate...

Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 26 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

GDPR into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
7.6%

15 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for GDPR. 182 are genuine gaps.

63.2%DSP - Data Security & Privacy Lifecycle Management
7.7%HRS - Human Resources Security
12.5%SEF - Security Incident Management, E-Discovery & Cloud Forensics
7.1%STA - Supply Chain Management, Transparency & Accountability
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 49 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: CCM-DSP-03 Data Inventory

The processing register is an inventory of personal data categories and holdings.

Grounded in GDPR-Art.30 Records of processing activities. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: CCM-A&A-01 Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures

Maintain approved audit and assurance policies, procedures and standards that are documented, communicated to the staff they bind, applied in practice, and reassessed at least once a year.

Every one of the 15 evidenced controls and 182 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to GDPR
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 20% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many GDPR controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and GDPR?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 40 overlapping controls (20% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 20 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and GDPR?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 40 map directly to GDPR controls, representing 20% coverage. The remaining 157 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to GDPR?

157 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 20 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and GDPR?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (20 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.