Cross-Framework Mapping

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsNIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE

See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

394
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
93%
Coverage

Need this as a report you can hand to an assessor? A coverage crosswalk for this pair can be built to order.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE with 93% coverage across 183 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 14 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 309K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 394 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 309K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

A&A - Audit & Assurance(12 mappings)

CCM-A&A-01Audit and Assurance Policy and Procedures
CA-1Policy and Procedures
CCM-A&A-02Independent Assessments3 targets
CA-2Control Assessments
CA-2(1)Independent Assessors
CA-7(1)Independent Assessment
CCM-A&A-03Risk Based Planning Assessment3 targets
CA-2Control Assessments
CA-7Continuous Monitoring
RA-3Risk Assessment
CCM-A&A-04Requirements Compliance2 targets
CA-2Control Assessments
PL-2System Security and Privacy Plans
CCM-A&A-05Audit Management Process2 targets
CA-2Control Assessments
CA-7Continuous Monitoring
CCM-A&A-06Remediation
CA-5Plan of Action and Milestones

AIS - Application & Interface Security(8 mappings)

CCM-AIS-01Application and Interface Security Policy and Procedures3 targets
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the
SA-3System Development Life Cycle
SA-8Security and Privacy Engineering Principles
CCM-AIS-02Application Security Baseline Requirements2 targets
CM-6Configuration Settings
SA-4Acquisition Process
CCM-AIS-03Application Security Metrics
SA-11Developer Testing and Evaluation
CCM-AIS-04Secure Application Design and Development2 targets
PL-8Security and Privacy Architectures
SA-15Development Process, Standards, and Tools. a. Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to follow a documented development process that: 1. Explicitly addresses security and privacy requirements; 2. Identifies the

+374 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

A Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE crosswalk, built to order

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE (built to order)
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 93% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (309K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE covers 275 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 183 overlapping controls (93% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 4 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE equivalent.

How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 183 map directly to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE controls, representing 93% coverage. The remaining 14 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

14 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 4 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 MODERATE?

The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (4 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.