Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1vsISO 27001:2022
See exactly how Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls map to ISO 27001:2022. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 27001:2022 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 maps to ISO 27001:2022 with 91% coverage across 180 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls identifies 17 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 197 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 266 mapped controls across 17 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
A&A - Audit & Assurance(7 mappings)
AIS - Application & Interface Security(12 mappings)
BCR - Business Continuity Management & Operational Resilience(1 mappings)
+246 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to ISO 27001:2022 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 27001:2022 controls your existing Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
Coverage does not run both ways. Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 into ISO 27001:2022 lands at 74.2%, while ISO 27001:2022 into Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 lands at 56.3%, on the same two control sets. That is not a rounding difference. It is the whole reason these are two separate reports: one asks what your Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 evidence buys you for ISO 27001:2022, the other asks the reverse.
69 of 93 ISO 27001:2022 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1. 24 are genuine gaps.
111 of 197 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for ISO 27001:2022. 86 are genuine gaps.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 91% in the header counts how many Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 27001:2022 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 comparisons
Other ISO 27001:2022 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and ISO 27001:2022?
Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 has 197 controls across its framework, while ISO 27001:2022 covers 93 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 180 overlapping controls (91% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management, where 3 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct ISO 27001:2022 equivalent.
How many controls map between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and ISO 27001:2022?
Of 197 total Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls, 180 map directly to ISO 27001:2022 controls, representing 91% coverage. The remaining 17 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 to ISO 27001:2022?
17 Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 27001:2022. The highest concentration of gaps is in CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management with 3 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between Cloud Security Alliance Cloud Controls Matrix (CCM) v4.0.1 and ISO 27001:2022?
The domain with the highest gap count is CEK - Cryptography, Encryption & Key Management (3 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.