Cross-Framework Mapping

Australia My Health Records Act 2012vsGDPR

See exactly how Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls map to GDPR. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

49
Controls Mapped
0
Gaps Found
68%
Coverage

A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which GDPR controls you already evidence.

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 maps to GDPR with 68% coverage across 27 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 40 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls identifies 13 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in Registration and Participation.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 40 controls analysed | 686 frameworks | 310K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 20 of 49 mapped controls across 6 domains. Sign up to explore all 310K+ mappings across 686 frameworks.

Collection, Use and Disclosure(13 mappings)

MYHR-CUD-1Authorised collection, use and disclosure only3 targets
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
MYHR-CUD-2Prohibition on unauthorised collection, use and disclosure2 targets
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
GDPR-Art.6Lawfulness of processing
MYHR-CUD-3Use limited to My Health Record purposes2 targets
GDPR-Art.5Principles relating to processing of personal data
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data
MYHR-CUD-4Records not held or taken outside Australia3 targets
GDPR-Art.30Records of processing activities
GDPR-Art.44General principle for transfers
GDPR-Art.46Transfers subject to appropriate safeguards
MYHR-CUD-5Interaction with the Privacy Act 1988
GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller
MYHR-CUD-6Prohibition on use for a prohibited purpose2 targets
GDPR-Art.22Automated individual decision-making, including profiling
GDPR-Art.9Processing of special categories of personal data

Breach and Enforcement(7 mappings)

MYHR-ENF-1Mandatory data breach notification2 targets
GDPR-Art.33Notification of a personal data breach to the supervisory authority
GDPR-Art.34Communication of a personal data breach to the data subject
MYHR-ENF-2Civil penalty compliance
GDPR-Art.24Responsibility of the controller
MYHR-ENF-3Criminal offences and sanctions2 targets
GDPR-Art.29Processing under the authority of the controller or processor
GDPR-Art.32Security of processing
MYHR-ENF-4Enforceable undertakings and injunctions
GDPR-Art.31Cooperation with the supervisory authority
MYHR-ENF-5Infringement notices
GDPR-Art.31Cooperation with the supervisory authority

+29 more mappings

Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 686 frameworks.

Create Free Account →

Free forever, no credit card required

Coverage crosswalk

The Australia My Health Records Act 2012 to GDPR crosswalk

The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which GDPR controls your existing Australia My Health Records Act 2012 work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 into GDPR
35%

14 of 40 GDPR controls are evidenced by work you have already done for Australia My Health Records Act 2012. 26 are genuine gaps.

43.8%Chapter IV - Controller and Processor
42.9%Chapter II - Principles
27.3%Chapter III - Rights of the Data Subject
16.7%Chapter V - Transfers of Personal Data
Machine verified. Claude Code on the Max plan, judged in context, signed off 2026-08-20. 37 candidate mappings were examined and 0 were removed by a pass whose job was to argue against them.Mappings were judged by Claude Code rather than read line by line by a practitioner. Every claim shows its reasoning so you can check it. Ask and a practitioner will review this pair.

A sample of what the report says

Evidenced: GDPR-Art.16 Right to rectification

The System Operator must act on correction of information held.

Grounded in MYHR-GOV-5 Retention, destruction and correction obligations of the System Operator. Confidence high, survived the refutation pass.

Gap: GDPR-Art.10 Processing of personal data relating to criminal convictions

Process personal data relating to criminal convictions and offences, or related security measures, only under the control of official authority or where Union or Member State law authorises the processing and provides appropriate...

Every one of the 14 evidenced controls and 26 gaps in the report carries this much reasoning, so you can check the claim rather than take it on trust.

GDPR into Australia My Health Records Act 2012
Not published yet

This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.

If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 to GDPR
$299
per framework pair, one time
  • Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
  • Every gap, with what it requires
  • Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number

Why this page shows two different percentages. The 68% in the header counts how many Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many GDPR controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.

A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 686 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 686 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (310K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$149/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between Australia My Health Records Act 2012 and GDPR?

Australia My Health Records Act 2012 has 40 controls across its framework, while GDPR covers 40 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 27 overlapping controls (68% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Registration and Participation, where 8 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls have no direct GDPR equivalent.

How many controls map between Australia My Health Records Act 2012 and GDPR?

Of 40 total Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls, 27 map directly to GDPR controls, representing 68% coverage. The remaining 13 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping Australia My Health Records Act 2012 to GDPR?

13 Australia My Health Records Act 2012 controls have no direct equivalent in GDPR. The highest concentration of gaps is in Registration and Participation with 8 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between Australia My Health Records Act 2012 and GDPR?

The domain with the highest gap count is Registration and Participation (8 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.