CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vsISO 22301:2019
See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to ISO 22301:2019. Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.
A reviewed coverage crosswalk for this pair is available. See which ISO 22301:2019 controls you already evidence.
According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to ISO 22301:2019 with 59% coverage across 23 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 39 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 16 compliance gaps, primarily concentrated in CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program.
Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 39 controls analysed | 868 frameworks | 315K+ cross-framework mappings
Control Mappings
Showing 20 of 41 mapped controls across 5 domains. Sign up to explore all 315K+ mappings across 868 frameworks.
CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program(7 mappings)
CFTC System Safeguards: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(13 mappings)
+21 more mappings
Plus AI-powered gap analysis, compliance advisory, PDF exports, and cross-mapping for all 868 frameworks.
Create Free Account →Free forever, no credit card required
The CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to ISO 22301:2019 crosswalk
The table above lists candidate mappings. A crosswalk answers the narrower question you are probably here for: which ISO 22301:2019 controls your existing CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) work already satisfies, which are real gaps, and the reasoning behind every claim so you can check it. One pair, $299, one time.
22 of 57 ISO 22301:2019 controls are evidenced by work you have already done for CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49). 35 are genuine gaps.
This direction has not been through crosswalk review and sign off, so no coverage figure is published for it. Reporting an unreviewed number would be worse than reporting none. It can be built to order at the same price as a pair that is already on the shelf.
If the two frameworks turn out to have too little in common for a crosswalk to help you, we say so and refund it rather than send a number worth nothing.
- Every evidenced control, with the reasoning behind it
- Every gap, with what it requires
- Its level of review stated plainly, not a bare number
Why this page shows two different percentages. The 59% in the header counts how many CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls carry at least one candidate mapping in the graph, before any review. The crosswalk percentage counts something stricter: how many ISO 22301:2019 controls are actually evidenced, after a pass that argued against each mapping and kept only what survived. They answer different questions and they are not meant to agree.
A crosswalk narrows the work. It does not replace an audit, and your assessor may take a different view on individual controls. Mappings between frameworks are judgements, not text printed in either standard, which is why every claim in the report shows its reasoning. Questions go to support@theartofservice.com.
Related Comparisons
Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons
Other ISO 22301:2019 comparisons
Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets
Cross-framework mappings across 868 frameworks, at a fraction of consulting costs.
Free
- ✓ 868 framework browser
- ✓ Cross-framework mappings (315K+)
- ✓ 824 compliance assessments
- ✓ 3 AI queries & searches per day
Professional
- ✓ Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
- ✓ Unlimited full-text search
- ✓ Framework self-assessment
- ✓ PDF, Excel & CSV exports
What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and ISO 22301:2019?
CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 39 controls across its framework, while ISO 22301:2019 covers 57 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 23 overlapping controls (59% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program, where 6 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct ISO 22301:2019 equivalent.
How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and ISO 22301:2019?
Of 39 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 23 map directly to ISO 22301:2019 controls, representing 59% coverage. The remaining 16 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.
What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to ISO 22301:2019?
16 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in ISO 22301:2019. The highest concentration of gaps is in CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program with 6 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.
Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and ISO 22301:2019?
The domain with the highest gap count is CFTC System Safeguards: Risk Analysis and Oversight Program (6 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.
Related Resources
This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.