Cross-Framework Mapping

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49)vs21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)

See exactly how CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls map to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). Pre-computed mappings, identified gaps, and coverage analysis.

7
Controls Mapped
42
Gaps Found
10%
Coverage

According to the TheArtOfService Compliance Knowledge Graph:

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) maps to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) with 10% coverage across 5 directly mapped controls. Analysis of 49 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls identifies 44 compliance gaps — primarily concentrated in Information Security.

Source: TheArtOfService Knowledge Graph | 49 controls analysed | 693 frameworks | 819K+ cross-framework mappings

Control Mappings

Showing 7 of 7 mapped controls across 3 domains. Sign up to explore all 819K+ mappings across 693 frameworks.

Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery(2 mappings)

38.1051(c)(1)Recovery Time Objectives2 targets
58.1Scope
58.3Definitions

Systems Development and Physical Security(1 mappings)

38.1051(f)Physical Security Controls
58.43Animal Care Facilities

Information Security(4 mappings)

EIOPA-GL-10ICT Operations Security2 targets
58.1Scope
58.3Definitions
EIOPA-GL-9Physical Security
58.43Animal Care Facilities
TISAX-IS-01ISMS Requirements
58.43Animal Care Facilities

Related Comparisons

Other CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) comparisons

Other 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) comparisons

Stop Paying Consultants to Read Spreadsheets

AI-powered compliance intelligence across 693 frameworks — at a fraction of consulting costs.

$0/forever

Free

  • 693 framework browser
  • Cross-framework mappings (819K+)
  • 824 compliance assessments
  • 3 AI queries & searches per day
Get Started Free
Recommended
$49/month

Professional

  • Unlimited AI Compliance Advisory
  • Unlimited full-text search
  • Framework self-assessment
  • PDF, Excel & CSV exports
Start 7-Day Free Trial →

What are the key differences between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) has 49 controls across its framework, while 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) covers 31 controls. Direct mapping analysis identifies 5 overlapping controls (10% coverage). The frameworks diverge most significantly in Information Security, where 30 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) equivalent.

How many controls map between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

Of 49 total CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls, 5 map directly to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP) controls — representing 10% coverage. The remaining 44 controls represent compliance gaps requiring additional documentation or compensating controls to satisfy both frameworks simultaneously.

What are the compliance gaps when mapping CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) to 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

44 CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) controls have no direct equivalent in 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP). The highest concentration of gaps is in Information Security with 30 unmapped controls. These gaps represent areas where additional controls, policies, or documentation must be created to achieve compliance with both frameworks.

Which control domains have the most gaps between CFTC System Safeguards (17 CFR 37, 38, 39, 49) and 21 CFR Part 58 — Good Laboratory Practice (GLP)?

The domain with the highest gap count is Information Security (30 gaps). Export the full domain-by-domain gap breakdown via the Professional tier to generate a prioritised remediation roadmap.

This platform provides educational compliance tools, not legal, regulatory, or professional compliance advice. Cross-framework mappings are AI-assisted interpretations and do not reproduce or replace official standards. Framework names and trademarks belong to their respective owners. Consult qualified professionals for your specific compliance requirements. See our Terms of Service.